Archives for category: India

[They inform us, they amuse us, they entertain us, they exasperate us — all this, in 140 characters or fewer. The biggest benefit of Twitter has been to democratize information, insight, humour; to take ‘content’ out of the hands of the ‘traditional’ media, and to create/empower a community of ‘curators’ through whose filters we increasingly see the world around us.

It is a vast, vibrant community — and ‘140 Characters’, a new series on Yahoo! India Blog — is an attempt both to sample that community, and to pay it the homage that is overdue. Ever so often, we bring you one ‘Character’, one person on Twitter we like and recommend that you follow, as these are people who will enrich your life for knowing them.  So — drumroll — here’s ‘Supergirl’:]

In the real world, acquaintance begins with a name; over time, we gather more detail and, as the person’s ‘profile’ gradually fills out, our reactions to the person — like, dislike, indifference — crystallize.

It’s different in the online world, where often, the reaction comes first. We ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ someone based on a whim, a fancy, a nicely done display picture or mind-tingling tweet, and we decide to ‘follow’ that person. Our ‘acquaintance’ is constructed of random, unconnected bits and pieces, all coming together in a patchwork-quilt ‘profile’ as incomplete as it can be startlingly intimate.

Take the person who, on Twitter, is known by the handle MumbaiCentral. [You can follow her here]. When that handle first surfaces on your timeline, god knows how, you deduce the person lives/works in, or has some core connection with, that area of Mumbai. On a whim, you hit the ‘follow’ button, and you think no more about it.

And then, over time, random posts float by. Like this:

  1. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral Does anyone have any tips on keeping fine cheese in the fridge? Mine keep developing mould on them. Help! @kaaliya @qtfan 12 Jul 2010 from Gravity
  2. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral @crazytwism For the record, I like Mysore Cafe coffee more than Madras. 🙂 To each his own! 12 Jul 2010 from Gravity in reply to crazytwism
  3. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral @_vishalg My boyfriend took me to Indigo for my birthday. He’s my husband now. Nuff said. 😛 13 Jul 2010 from Gravity in reply to _vishalg

Ah, so: ‘Mumbai Central’ is female, and married; she likes fine-dining and is possibly romantic in nature; she is not too hung up/snobby about the fine-dining bit, though, since she seems well-versed with the crowded cafes of the Matunga region; she keeps cheese — fine cheese, not those cheesy Amul cubes — in the fridge and is possibly fond of wine — possibly fine wine — to go with it…

It’s like doing a jigsaw where you don’t know what the finished image looks like. You fit a piece here, a piece there, constructing an image that may, or may not, bear some resemblance to the original;  you keep slotting in the pieces as they surface in random order, and you end up liking the finished portrait. Or not.

Earlier this week, a series of posts surfaced on Mumbai Central’s timeline. Like, so:

  1. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral The Mumbai Police are ridiculous.
  2. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral One of my Clients, a lady living with her 10 yr old son and 80 yr old mother in law are being threatened by the Police.
  3. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral So story goes like this: man arrested on charge of murder. facts are irrelevant. His wife is being harassed to come to the Police Station.
  4. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral Now, the CrPC says that every contact with a woman who is not an accused is to be had at her own home, she cannot be called to the PS.
  5. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral In any case women cannot be called to a Police Station or even arrested between sunset and sunrise.
  6. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral So I told her to, well, not go to the Police Station.
  7. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral So now, the Police are coming to effect a “house search” post sunset in a house of two women, one of whom is a sr citizen, and a minor.

That first post, about the Mumbai police, skims by unnoticed; it will acquire relevance only in light of subsequent revelations. What is Twitter for, after all, if not to crib — about the weather, the government, the batsman who cannot score runs or the bowler who cannot take wickets, to rant at life itself?

But as the posts accumulate in rapid succession, more pieces to the puzzle come to hand; the portrait begins to gain depth, dimension. ‘Mumbai Central’ is a lawyer. She is combative, feisty, and — remarkably in a world where we step around a stricken person on the street and go our way rather than get involved — she is prepared to go the extra mile [Mumbai Central to Chembur, at rush hour, during the monsoon, is a lot of extra miles] to fight injustice.

Within those first few tweets, we are riveted by the sense of a developing story; we constantly refresh our own timelines for updates. Where till moments ago ‘Mumbai Central’ was just another handle floating past on a crowded timeline, she becomes the handle we seek as we refresh, and refresh again.

  1. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral The man was arrested on the night of 2nd July, he has been in Police Custody, tmrw he will be produced before a Magistrate. Get it?
  2. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral I know I’m never going to reach Chembur but I had to try. I’ve seen a lot of Police excesses in my time but today I have had enough.
  3. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral I don’t know if I should be tweeting about this but it’s all I can do. If this gets me debarred, bring it on!

By now dozens, possibly hundreds, of us are totally into the developing story; some asking for clarifications, others offering directions, yet others offering unspecified help. And all this while, ‘MumbaiCentral’ is battling the city’s insane rush hour traffic; frustration shows in an expletive-laden update on the jam at Priyadarshini Circle, a notorious choke-point on the Sion-Trombay Road just before you enter Chembur proper. And then, this:

  1. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral I reached JUST IN TIME.
  2. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral They’ve handcuffed the guy. Well well well. Supreme Court directives down the fucking drain.
  3. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral Cops are asking “heela kashala bolowlo?” of course.
  4. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral This is heartbreaking. He asked (and got, thanks to me) permission to shave.
  5. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral Because he wanted to see his son, who has typhoid. His son doesn’t know about the arrest.
  6. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral And so the father doesn’t want his son to see him unshaven.
  7. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral So my arrival has made sure that no force was used. Boy, are these cops pissed. One cop stormed out after I raised the handcuffing issue.
  8. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral Man, what a day. It was totally worth it to see some pissed off cops.

The original audience has by now grown exponentially, thanks to dozens of re-tweets. Some of us discuss the propensity of the police to disregard all norms of procedure; others tell of their own experiences with authority. Thanks to a young woman, we have suddenly become, albeit momentarily, a community with a commonality.

Congratulations and complements flood ‘MumbaiCentral’s’ timeline in profusion. And the feisty lawyer who without thought had set off on a crusade against the Mumbai cops turns into a somewhat shy young woman, unwittingly caught in the spotlight of mass attention and unsure quite how to handle it. Her reaction is typical of those the spotlight has to seek out, rather than those who seek the spotlight: an expletive-inflected post that marvels at her ow reaction to praise; immediately following, a polite thank you couched in the stilted vocabulary of the suddenly shy.

  1. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral Am actually getting fucking senti reading all your tweets of support. Thank you all.
  2. Mumbai Central
    MumbaiCentral I would really like to thank all of you for following my adventure and offering your support.

The saga is at an end — but this one has shelf-life, an impact beyond the immediate. Through three hours of a rainy Tuesday evening, ‘Mumbai Central’ has grown to a greater understanding of how much the rule of law means to her; of what she is capable of if she puts her mind to it. The realization, one suspects, will infuse her work, and her life, from here on.

And those of us who followed her crusade, fingers crossed for her to come out of it safe, have grown with her — to a sheepish, somewhat shame-faced understanding of our own apathy and to a realization, however temporary, that when confronted with injustice it is necessary to do more than frame it in 140 characters; the awareness that sometimes, the choice is between getting our hands dirty in the fight or losing a little bit of our soul to apathy and indifference.

And in course of this shared journey, ‘MumbaiCentral’ has somehow gone from being a handle to being a friend you respect and are glad to know. You still don’t have a name for her, or a face. Unless she looks like her display picture , you wouldn’t be able to pick her out in a crowd to say hello to, to congratulate [oh  by the way, if you are her Twitter friend, don’t presume on that to hug her when you first meet her in person — she doesn’t like that; another fact gleaned from a passing tweet].

You don’t have any of the details that are the early building blocks of an offline friendship — but in the online world, somehow, none of that seems to matter.

Here’s MumbaiCentral — go make a friend.

Also read: #1 of 140 Characters: Ramesh Srivats

“The proper study of Mankind is Man…”

How true the quote is! If I’m asked to give a poetic touch to it, I’ll say that ‘You can see a world in one’s eyes’. While capturing the landscapes, I’m often left with awe at the artistic work of the great Creator, something that elevates me. Still, I feel there is something more enigmatic about His most wonderful creations – human beings.  A child, or an old man, or even the lone ranger, they all talk of life, of different emotions – innocence, pain, angst, longing…

Sometimes the best feelings are left unsaid, but what words can’t say, pictures do. Here are some wordless stories:

(Text by Princy James)

Daya Nayak can now heave a sigh of relief as The Supreme Court has annulled the MCOCA (Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act) and other cases against the former  encounter specialist of the Mumbai Squad. It was ironic that a man who once was the nightmare of wrong-doers himself came under question in the eyes of the law after being accused of possession of disproportionate income, accepting money from mafia bosses and also for allegedly having links with gangster Chhota Shakeel.

His blog states:

I started this blog because I could only see rank injustice, but the outcome has completely reaffirmed my faith in my country’s judicial system. I started it because the truth needed to be told, and now the truth has been proven, entirely and without question. I started it because an innocent man—unjustly accused—needed support, and you all gave it. Daya Nayak is free, finally.

Take a closer look at Daya Nayak’s life, and you will find enough stuff for a typical gangster-cop Bollywood flick. A sub-inspector with the Mumbai police force, Daya’s life changed after taking part in the operations of Mumbai Encounter Squad. He annihilated a whole bunch of gangsters after joining the Squad formed by the Maharashtra government to tackle Mumbai’s underworld. It’s estimated that he killed 86 gangsters during his term.

Ketan Tirodkar, Nayak’s estranged friend and an ex-journalist, who himself is facing trial for his alleged involvement in underworld activities filed a complaint accusing Nayak of accepting money from mafia/underworld bosses citing his alleged links with Pakistan-based gangster Chhota Shakeel.  Read Tehelka’s report on Ketan Tirodkar here.

On February 2006, Mumbai Police Anti-Corruption Bureau declared Nayak absconding. Nayak voluntarily surrenders at the court, where he is arrested on a non-bailable warrant. The anti-corruption officials raided his house and the Sessions Court issued a non-bailable warrant against Nayak. Without charging any file sheet, he was kept in prison for 60 days and was later  released on bail. A close friend of his, P. Manivelan, was also kept in custody without any evidence. After their release, Manivelan filed a case with the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) for his unlawful detention which he later won. After facing these humiliating ordeals, the Maharashtra Government suspended Nayak and he remained in suspension for 3 years suffering great  mental trauma and disgrace.

Flimsy allegations and suspension have put Nayak’s career and image under shadow. Once being hailed as a super cop, there were many films based on Nayak of which the most famous is ‘Ab Tak Chhappan’ (2004) by Shimit Amin where Nana Patekar enacted Nayak’s life on-screen. N Chandra’s ‘Kagaar’ and Kannada film ‘Encounter Daya Nayak‘ were also based on his life.

His life has taken him through many phases – he lived the life of a hero and villain at the same time. Now with the SC judgement paving the way for Nayak’s reinstatement soon, he seems to be happy again – just like a Bollywood flick ending on a good note.

In a significant step towards peace in the region, Indian and Pakistani foreign ministers have met for the first time in a bilateral summit in Islamabad since 26/11. This follows a decision taken earlier in Bhutan by the Prime Ministers of both countries to normalize relations.

The question is how often has India done its part to revive relations with Pakistan, only to be snubbed? The Pak government has, so far, only made a lot of promises, most of them half-heartedly, only to back-track later. Even the ghastly 26/11 Mumbai attack and the ensuing international outcry that followed didn’t get Pakistan to shut shop of its terror patronage and arrest its leaders.

Here’s a look at all that has transpired in Indo-Pak talks since 26/11. The timeline:

Dec 2008: India accuses Pakistanis for carrying out the 26/11 attacks. Tensions rise between the two neighbours.

Jan 2009: Pakistan seeks resumption of the peace process and says it was committed to bringing the Mumbai perpetrators to justice.

Feb 2009: India welcomes Pakistan’s investigation into the Mumbai attack. Pakistan admits to 26/11 attacks launched and partly planned on its soil.

June 2009: Prime Ministers Manmohan Singh and Asif Zardari meet in Russia on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit.

February 2010: India renews offer for talks with Pakistan, this time at a diplomatic level.

July 2010: External Affairs Minister S M Krishna along with Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao reach Islamabad to revive talks with Pakistan.

July 16: However, a day after the talks begin, the strain in the dialogue process was apparent. A headline reads ‘Pakistan accuses India of selective focus on terror’. Here’s an NDTV report on ‘How Pak media reported Indo-Pak talks’. Reports of a breakdown in the talks began to surface soon after.

Amid the reports of the talks collapsing, one man who’s brought to the forefront is Union Home Secretary GK Pillai. The BJP voiced that SM Krishna should have defended Pillai when Pakistani FM Qureshi criticised him. The Hurriyat, it seems, were also waiting for a positive outcome of the meeting and that the failed talks left the Kashmiris in the lurge.

Here’s the detailed timeline.

Related links:

Discussion board on Pakistan Defence site details how media bias and lack of information sharing has led to Pakistan’s noncommittal response to the peace process so far.

Amid hopes, foreign ministers of India and Pakistan extend talks.

Headley Case: The Big Story on FTP

Circa 2008, India was in a state of shock when it witnessed Mumbai being held at gun point by terrorists for three days. In the aftermath, there was no doubt in anyone’s mind that this attack was the first of many – the only unanswered question was, when would the next attack come, and where would it strike?

That dreaded attack has not materialized, if you discount the German Bakery, Pune blast of earlier this year. And this in turn has led the government of India to repeatedly suggest that India is safe.

At an Intelligence Bureau Endowment Lecture recently, Home Minister P Chidambaram asserted how India had remained incident free for nearly 14 months. “Honestly, it is because of dame luck that there has been no terror attack,” the minister replied.

What is interesting is not the response, wherein the man responsible for the country’s safety pinned his bets on “luck”, but the framing of the question itself: Why are we safe, Chidambaram was asked – a question that presupposes that we are in fact safe.

Are we?

Responding to a Right to Information question, the home ministry recently said that there were 1,737 terrorism-related deaths in 2007; 1,769 in 2008; and 2,372 deaths in 2009.

Those numbers should give us pause; it should make us ask the question: are we as safe as the government suggests we are?

Clearly not – so where does the pervasive presumption of safety come from? Simply, it stems from the fact that in public perception, terrorism is counted as such only when it involves the “foreign hand”. That is the sort of parsing that might suit the keepers of governmental statistics – but for the mango man, terrorism is defined far more simply: it is the random killing of the innocent.

If you accept that definition of terrorism, the picture looks altogether grimmer. Consider this fact: 439 people have been killed in various acts of terrorism between January and May this year alone. Consider another: as many as 178 identified terrorist groups operate across the ground in India today. Here’s the breakup:

Assam: 36 terrorist outfits

Jammu & Kashmir: 32 terrorist outfits

Manipur: 39 terrorist outfits

Meghalaya: 4 terrorist outfits

Nagaland: 3 terrorist outfits

Punjab: 12 terrorist outfits

Tripura: 30 terrorist outfits

Mizoram: 2 terrorist outfits

Arunachal Pradesh: 1 terrorist outfit

So clearly, Mr Chidambaram’s perception of a safe India is some miles off the mark. The question really is – why is the country drenched continually in innocent blood, and what needs to be done to turn the tide around.

Where does this link go? An article in Forbes’s Business states:

One of the most important reasons for insecurity of the average Indian is the acute shortage of police personnel. The numbers tell the story: today, India has 145 policemen for every 100,000 people, which is a fraction of the ideal ratio. In fact, India ranks number 47 worldwide, in police: public ratio

Not having enough police personnel [the United Nations mandates 222 policemen for every 100,000 population] is bad enough; in India the problem is compounded by the fact that on most days, a sizeable number of available personnel are deployed on what is called “security duty”  – that is to say, ensuring that our politicians are not bothered by the people they purportedly represent.

If personnel are inadequate, leadership is even more so: the current deficit in the Indian Police Service cadres is pegged at 17 per cent. And in a further touch of irony, the states with the most pressing security concerns are the worst placed in terms of capacity. Orissa, for instance, has a sanctioned strength of 207 officers, but only has 97.

The intelligence bureau bears a large part of the onus on terrorism-prevention – and here the situation is much worse: the IB is estimated to have only around 3,000 officers available in the field to actively collect intelligence, even though its strength is estimated to be 25,000.

Strengthening the police force and improving the quality of their equipment is only one part of the solution. It is commonly accepted that domestic terrorist groups, particularly the Maoists, find fertile ground for growth among the country’s marginalized communities, the ones untouched by the much-vaunted economic development.

Timeline: Red Terror

Even as India prides itself on its growth rate and on how it is fast becoming one of the most important economy in the world, an important facet of that development remains skewed. Dr Walter Fernandes, an expert on skews in development, in a study estimated that in the period 1947 to 2004, over 60 million people had been displaced/evicted from their natural habitats, spread across 25 million hectares. 40 per cent of those displaced are tribals, and only 27 per cent of the total number of people displaced has ever been rehabilitated.

Look at it another way: in the name of India’s development, hundreds of thousands of people annually lose their homes, their habitats, their livelihood – and form a pool of festering discontent that feeds terrorist groups with a growing pool of recruits.

Compounding the problem is the fact that successive governments have been less than proactive about identifying problems and solving them before they fester into widespread crisis. Take the Maoist issue: Naxalism first surfaced around 1967, and has systematically spread its tentacles since that date. When Prime Minister Manmohan Singh declared last year that the Maoists were the most serious threat to India’s internal security, he was referring to the fact that in that year, the Naxals were estimated to be active in 220 districts across 20 Indian states, controlling a stunning 92,000 square miles of territory in what is commonly known as the Red Corridor [an area of crippling poverty and social unrest that stretches across Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal.

On April 6, 2010, when Maoist terrorists killed 76 CRPF personnel in an ambush in Dantewada, the government spoke of “needing to find a solution”, of “considering its options”. It is perhaps the most telling indictment of the government – in fact of successive governments – that a problem the country has lived with for the better part of five decades has only now, and only in the wake of a horrific massacre, reached the stage of “considering options”.

That is symptomatic of how governments have operated in India. As long as the disaffected do not thrust themselves into the public consciousness – and violence is the only means they have to signal their displeasure – the government is perfectly happy to ignore them, oblivious of the fact that small problems, left unattended, can metastasize to cancerous proportions.

The government, at the center and in the states of Jharkhand, Orissa, West Bengal and Chattisgarh in particular, need to engage with the rebels and, more importantly, address the reasons for the widespread disaffection in those regions. If economic development spread across those territories, there would be less reason for the populace to feel alienated; however, the area remains among the most neglected in India.

But why blame the government alone, when we the people, and our mouthpiece the media, have been equally complicit? The plight of the disadvantaged is never our business; we do not care as long as we ourselves are the beneficiaries of India’s famed ‘development’. Since it is not an issue for us, the media ignores it as well, unless a Dantewada happens and we get an outbreak of noise on TV for a couple of days, to be promptly forgotten as we shift our focus back to the next Bollywood starlet or next high paid cricketer.

To circle back to where we started – we are not safe, and the reasons for that are systemic. It then follows that unless that problem is addressed systemically, we will merely continue to bask in illusory safety, until the next massacre. And the next.

In today’s world where gender dynamics change everyday, relationships are being redefined. There was a time when the only man/men a married woman knew outside of her husband were her brother-in-law/s but all that has changed. Men and women are increasingly meeting new people at their workplace, in social circles and at other informal interactions. How does this impact the man-woman relationship and more specifically, marriages?

For a very long time I thought that open marriages were a totally western concept. So one lazy Sunday afternoon, I sift through this lifestyle magazine during my pedicure session and stumble upon this article on open marriages in India. Surprise, surprise! So-called taboo topics like open marriages and swingers clubs seemed to be the buzz word among urban young couples.

View: Couples in open marriages justify their choice as a more pragmatic approach to deal with infidelity and the shock and trauma that the significant other goes through.

Gone are the days when marriages were meant to be water-tight units that bound individuals together; notions of freedom, space and choice are increasingly gaining popularity.

We all perceive our married life to be a certain way and when it turns out to be quite different from what we expected, what do we do? Do we spend our entire life learning to live with what we have? Do we walk out of our marriage? Or do we accept our marriage the way it is and actively pursue what’s missing outside?

Their argument is that when individuals in a marriage admit to being attracted to someone else at some point or the other in their relationship, then they might as well be open about it.

Marriage doesn’t change basic human nature; there’ll always be this conflict (momentary or persistent) when you might be attracted to someone else. Why curb your natural feelings rather than being open about it?

Some couples prefer to rather have the option of being in an open marriage than have their partner cheat on them without their knowledge.

Most men admit that at some point in their married lives, they seek sexual gratification elsewhere; in an open marriage, the women at least has the option of having an alternative choice rather than remaining in the dark about her spouse’s sexcapades.

Counterview: Why get married at all?

The institution of marriage for many is still sacred and sacrosanct; so if partners agree to dilute the very premise of ‘till death do us apart’, then what’s the point of being married in the first place?

If such notions become permissible in India then sooner or later we will head towards a society where family values will no longer hold true and remain strong and consistent.

Theoretically it might be easy to agree to the concept of an open marriage but what about its ramifications on your present relationship? What if the third-party gets more involved than you are prepared to handle?

An integral part of many marriages is to provide children with a stable upbringing; how secure will they be in an open marriage?

There are several arguments that can be made for and against this debate. The integral point is how do we define fidelity in our marriage? Is it possible to remain emotionally connected to one person even if you chose to have sexual relationships outside your marriage? If you have physically intimate relationships outside your marriage, does that in any way take away from the love and closeness that you share with your spouse?

Share your views for and against the topic. You can connect with me on Twitter as well.

You can read my previous related posts below:

Let’s Talk About Sex, Baby

After you say ‘I do’

Bad judgement, arrogance or twilight years – what ails the star who re-defined Bollywood cinema as it is today? Jackass is not a word one normally associates with Amitabh Bachchan. But this innocuous noun is the latest peeve in a list of peeves Mr Bachchan has had for some time now.  So in the Masand vs Bachchan brouhaha, Bachchan missed out the crass gimmickry of Akshay Kumar posing with the seriously ill R K Laxman at Breach Candy hospital. The usually erudite star didn’t question who came up with this ill-timed stunt? Who allowed Akshay Kumar to preen in a hospital? Oh wait…isn’t there some mega crores riding on Aishwarya Rai Bachchan’s back this year? Some of those depend on Akshay Kumar, her next co-star in Action Replayy.

So why has Amitabh Bachchan metamorphosed to Albert Pinto and imbibed the trademark gussa?  When he’s not playing cop on Twitter, Bachchan Senior takes time out to take pot-shots at the media on his blog. I am losing count at the number of petulant outbursts ‘rebutting’ yet another ‘biased’ media story. Honestly, why does Bachchan think he is always at the receiving end of media prejudice?

Amitabh Bachchan’s peevishness at the media didn’t really begin with his clashes over the Bachchan family’s reported superstitions at the time of Abhishek’s wedding. Or at the time of his 6-page letter trashing Jug Suraiya’s column in The Times of India for questioning Bachchan’s comments on Slumdog Millionaire. It’s always been there, as far back as the 80s.

Read Jug Suraiya’s column here.

The 15-year Stardust ban on Bachchan.

What began in the 80s carries on. So woe betide anyone questioning why the Bachchan family zips around in SUVs while expressing concern over the environment. Or were those endorsements? Paid spots? Amitabh Bachchan will rake up Dr Manmohan Singh, Ratan Tata, the Ambanis and anyone else with a gas guzzler in their vicinity.

Did Aishwarya Rai marry a peepul tree in Varanasi, a banana tree in a Bangalore temple and a god’s idol in Ayodhya, before she married Abhishek Bachchan? Is Amitabh Bachchan pressuring the couple to have a child?  Who knows? None of us can claim to be privy to information within the four walls of the Bachchan home or wherever they hold their family conferences.

Who cares? That’s just the point – several million.  Amitabh Bachchan has had a huge influence on the cultural zeitgeist. He’s been a superstar for a lifetime. Surely that’s enough time to know the objectification that goes with it. Stars are put on a pedestal and routinely brought down so for the general public, larger-than-life figures have a more vulnerable face as well. These aren’t lessons Amitabh Bachchan needs to learn or pointed too. He’s no novice.

Unless, the pressure is telling on Amitabh Bachchan. When Aishwarya Rai, joined the family, the valuation of Brand Bachchan was estimated to be at Rs 700 crore. Amitabh Bachchan endorses a multitude of products. So does Aishwarya. With the recession hitting full on, the endorsement space is shrinking. Towards the end of 2008, Cadbury dropped Amitabh Bachchan from its commercials. At a reported Rs 3-4 crore per ad, Amitabh Bachchan does not rule the roost anymore. Box office duds and controversial political rows and cronies have cost him.

So here comes frustration point 2. There is no one to pass the baton to. In the age of instant gratification and youth driving consumerism, Aishwarya Bachchan has younger actresses sniping at her heals. At 36, she may be touted as India’s crossover queen but others like Frieda Pinto and Mallika Sherawat are pretty darn close.

Ash with Eva Longoria on the Cannes Red Carpet this year, for L’Oreal – would Sonam look better?

Abhishek Bachchan is nothing to write home about – in films or Bollywood. In February this year, LG picked Akshay Kumar as its new face. Apparently Abhishek wanted Aishwarya to be part of the campaign as well, which didn’t fly with the bosses at LG. Now why would he do that?  If he thinks they look better together, I am not disputing that. But for the record, MS Dhoni has a good-looking wife too. They look great together and she loves the camera – unabashedly. Besides, there’s something very real about the Dhonis – not icy and artificial.

Mrs Dhoni preens for the camera.

Whatever the pressures on the Bachchan family -Brand Bachchan losing sheen, health issues, flop films, rivalry, envy (India’s biggest star did not bring home the Oscar) bad friends and political choices – Amitabh Bachchan cannot get personal.


Is more violence in store for the neighbouring states of Karnataka and Maharashtra?

With the Supreme Court asking the Maharashtra government to amend its plea vis-a-vis the Belgaum district, Karnataka is up in arms against this judgment.  It’s barely a day since the pronouncement and violence has already erupted in these two states.

Back in April this year, Karnataka CM Yeddyurappa said that it takes more than just the language to divide a state and that there can never be a “compromise” on this issue. However, two days back, Maharashtra CM Ashok Chavan reiterates that Belgaum must be made a part of his state since the majority speak Marathi there. Today he changes his stance.  Since the dispute is not nearing an end, he called for all 865 villages to be a made Union territory till the Court settles the dispute.

“There is no option other than making the villages an Union Territory and we would request the prime minister to cooperate with us on the issue,” Chavan said.

It all started back in 1956 with the States Reorganisation Act which integrated Belgaum into Karnataka. With Belgaum being mostly occupied by Marathi-speaking people, the Maharashtra government staked claim on this district, along with over 800 other bordering villages.

What should the Supreme Court rule? Should Belgaum be made a part of Maharashtra or maintain the status quo? And most importantly, what do the people of Belgaum want?

Timeline of the dispute in the past week:

July 15

Maharashtra Chieft Minister Ashok Chavan is expected to meet Prime Minister to discuss the Belgaum dispute. Also, Sena Chief Bal Thackeray has threatened to attack Kannadigas in Maharashtra, if the Karnataka government doesn’t take stern actions against violence in Belgaum.

July 14

Maha-Karnataka boundary row leaves BJP-Sena alliance in a fix

July 13

Declare disputed Karnataka areas Union Territory: Maha CM

Violence in Maha, K’taka over disputed Belgaum
Maharashtra gets 4 weeks to amend Belgaum plea

July 12

No buses from Maharashtra to Karnataka for next two days

July 11

CM-led delegation to meet Prime Minister over Belgaum issue

July 8

No change in Centre’s position on Belgaum issue
In SC, MHA rejects Maharashtra’s claim on Belgaum

Sept 14, 2010

Curfew was today extended to all major towns of the Kashmir Valley as a precautionary measure after violent clashes left 17 people dead and over 70 injured. The sources said the curfew was imposed in fresh areas as a precautionary measure and to prevent people from pouring out on roads and streets. Read more

Sept 13, 2010 – The bloodiest day in 3 months

In a sudden flare-up of violence in Kashmir today, 17 people, including a policeman, were killed and over 70 injured with mobs torching several government properties and a school, some of the trouble triggered by a TV report alleging desecration of the Quran in the US. The state cabinet, which met this evening, condemned the alleged act of desecration and made a fervent appeal to the people not to take law in their own hands. In New Delhi, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh voiced concern over the ongoing unrest in Jammu and Kashmir.

Aug 17, 2010

As the strife in Kashmir continues for yet another day, security forces have unearthed a militant hideout in Doda. Tension has been escalating in the Valley between the forces and the locals. Protesters took to the streets risking their lives.

Meanwhile in New Delhi, the Congress Working committee (CWC) met to decide the schedule to elect the party  chief. Kashmir was also discussed at the meet.

Party sources said the CWC spent considerable time of the over one-hour long meeting discussing Kashmir. The Congress is part of the alliance headed by the National Conference in Jammu and Kashmir and sections in the party have been insisting that Chief Minister Omar Abdullah make more concerted efforts to reach out to the people.

Aug 04, 2010

With the violence in the valley continuing to soar, non-Kashmiris are fleeing before they’re targetted. Indian Railways suspends operations in the state till things return to normal.

Meanwhile on the political front, questions are being raised whether chief minister Omar Abdullah can really curb the violence.

A group of senior Congress leaders, including legislators, former ministers and parliamentarians, met top party leaders including Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee and AICC general secretary Prithviraj Chavan over the past two days to express their apprehensions about Omar’s ability to handle the current crisis.

Aug 03, 2010

Kashmir continues to burn as protesters defy curfew in most parts of the valley and there is no let-up in violence and clashes between protesters. Security forces have claimed another life today and left five others injured.

Kashmir CM Omar Abdullah has asked the Centre for more paramilitary forces to restore calm in the state. Omar is facing the heat for the escalation in violence and unabated street protests in Kashmir. Meanwhile, Congress President Sonia Gandhi wants the perpetrators punished and has said the government will continue to push for development.

The government believes that the two Hurriyat factions aided by anti-India elements from Pakistan are fueling the violence and aggravating the situation in the valley. Despite restrictions, separatists groups are protesting human rights violations by security forces.

Caught in the midst of the violent clashes are innocent civilians. Traders in Kashmir are suffering huge losses due to the prevailing instability in the valley.  An eight-year-old boy was among those killed in yesterday’s violent clashes.

The valley has witnessed violent protests since June 11, claiming more the 36 lives. In one of the worst attacks this year, on August 1 a mob set fire to an abandoned police station near Srinagar. Four civilians were killed and 35 others injured as protesters pelted stones at police personnel.

Watch this space for more updates. More details below:

Jul 15th, 2010

Kashmir is on the edge as violence continues to erupt and political parties refuse to cooperate with Chief Minster Omar Abdullah in his relentless fight for peace.

Kashmir has been burning since July when curfew was imposed in Srinagar, Budgam, Anantnag, Pulwama, Pampore and Kupwara. The army was deployed to control the situation and restrictions on movement imposed in Sopore and Baramulla.

Curfew was imposed on July 6 after three people were killed in firing allegedly by security forces. Violent protests have left four dead. On Tuesday (July 6) evening, a teenager was shot dead; earlier that day, the body of a 17-year-old boy was found in a canal. The army staged a flag march on July 7 at the Srinagar Airport road. The curfew was finally lifted on July 11 and the situation described as “peaceful”.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has called for a cabinet meeting to discuss the Kashmir issue after CM Omar Abdullah asked the Centre to intervene. The J&K government has also banned the movement of media persons on July 7 following strict curfew restrictions.

On Monday July 12, CM Omar Abdullah convened an all party meet which was boycotted by Mehbooba Mufti-led PDP. Congress was not at all happy with its abstinence as clearly stated by its spokesperson Manish Tewari:

“Every political party which considers itself in the mainstream has to rise above politics and help restore peace and isolate the separatists.”

One of the outcomes of the all-party meet was that they decided to set up an independent committee to probe the civilian killings in the recent violence in the state.

“The chief minister said a delegation would meet Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to urge the central government to strengthen the stalled peace process through a dialogue.”

In the meantime, it is the common man, children in particular,  who are being affected the most as markets, educational institutions, banks and other business establishments remain closed and public transport is off the roads.  Tourism has been hit hard by the unrest in the valley. Life continues to be paralysed as restrictions  are still imposed in parts of the old city.

And while Kashmir burns, the politicians scramble to score brownie points over each other. The Opposition, BJP, leave no opportunity to scream “complete lack of political will to counter the separatists in the state…”

But there are two aspects to the Kashmir issue — the internal and the external, as  our columnist Ashok Malik points out.  Here are the solutions he proposes for the Kashmir flare-up.

Last week, TIME magazine carried a story by its writer Joel Stein entitled “My Own Private India”. His piece on Indian Americans didn’t go down well with the Indian community settled there. In India too, those who read the article were critical of his article. Before the issue could snowball into anything larger, the magazine came out with a public apology and said didn’t mean to offend Indians .

So this week, I surfed international news sites to see what news of India was making the headlines.

In the World section of The New York Times, Kashmir violence is featured as a slide show with little details of the reason of the conflict. But what is more prominent is a long article on Switzerland being a preferred travel destination for Indian tourists, all thanks to Bollywood and one man in particular, the eternal romantic, Yash Chopra.

But looks like Switzerland is getting stiff competition from an equally breathtaking country- New Zealand. The recently released ‘I hate luv storys’ chose to skip the Swiss alps for the New Zealand countryside.

Even before the “jaadu ki jhappi” was popularised by Sanjay Dutt, one person had been preaching its healing powers. Amma (as she’s popularly known) is said to cure the ailing, comfort the lonely with just a simple hug. Huffington Post features “India’s hugging saint” in their Living section. This comes in the wake of sainthood in India coming under the scanner, due to the likes of Swami Nityananda and his shenanigans.

“‘Shining India’ makes its poor pay the price of hosting Commonwealth Games, screams a headline in The Guardian. With the CWG fast approaching and the demolition drive continuing to displace many who’re in its way, we ask – what exactly are the Commonwealth Games about? India as a tourist destination, an elaborate eyewash to lure in more tourists or India’s sincere attempt at making its presence felt in the global sports arena?

The Daily Telegraph, Australia, has a travel feature on the world’s best hotels. And guess what, of the 11 hotels in the list, two are from India- the Oberoi Amarvilas and Oberoi Vanyavilas.

Which are your favourite hotels in India? Care to share your experiences with us? And which would you rate as the top luxury hotel in India?